Posts Tagged ‘ Like ’

Eat foods you like in 1200 calorie diet

February 25, 2011
By

1200 Forget calorie snack packs, the ebook 1200 calories diet is an easy and simple to lose weight that you can eat meals and snacks in increments of one hundred calories if you eat a package of Chips Ahoy snack or 1200 200 calorie calorie French fries.

Written by two sisters who have struggled with weight and diets all their lives, the 1200-calorie diet does not include a list of forbidden foods or diet pills to pop. In contrast, the 1200-calorie diet has been created for those who want and need to eat normal food.

With special attention to portion control and calories, the diet of 1200 calories you need to monitor what you eat and how much through a food diary, 1200 calories, weight tables, 1200 calories and exercise table Conversion, 1200, Tips and a cookbook in calories.

Maybe you want when you want, provided you keep the calories and portion control with the tools, the book provides.

The 100-Calorie Diet is an overall effective concept for losing weight and keeping it off since the guide teaches portion control and heightens your awareness of the calories in all foods.

With a doable exercise plan , tons of calorie-counting resources and tools and a cookbook, the 100-Calorie Diet ebook is the perfect solution for someone who needs flexibility in their diet plan and wants to adopt long-term healthy eating habits.

On the 100-Calorie Diet, women are allowed 1,500 calories a day and men allowed 2,000 calories. The diet does not promote low-fat or low-carb food choices, but it does show you how low-calorie foods can be consumed in much greater amounts and more frequently than higher fat foods. “Free” foods such as low-carb vegetables and other items like soy sauce, salsa, diet soda and pickles can be consumed without limits.

Once you decide on what you want to eat, you check its calorie content and figure out how much of it you can eat. Even though it is called the 100-Calorie Diet, you are consuming foods in 100-calorie units so whether you choose to eat 100 calories worth of tomatoes or 200 calories worth of an iced coffee drink, you are constantly keeping track of how your food choices match up with your overall daily calorie allowance.

http://www.fitnessmust.com/eat-foods-1200-calorie-diet


Article from articlesbase.com

I Hate Acai Berry SCAMS Like Acai Berry Diet!! – Part 2 (Oprah, Dr. Oz, Rachael Ray, Dr. Perricone)

February 25, 2011
By

www.AcaiBurn4U.com offers Acai Burn fairly to burn away that excess fat. Acaiburn is the #1 Acai Berry diet for quick weight loss. This Acai Berry Detox is the best all natural colon cleanse with AcaiBerry.

Roulette Software which Actually Works, Converting Like Crazy!

February 22, 2011
By

Roulette Software which Actually Works, Converting Like Crazy!
Online Casino Programmer leaks Software which is used to Break Roulette. This Software turns the cards on online casinos, giving players a massive advantage!
Roulette Software which Actually Works, Converting Like Crazy!

Child Safety Products A..to..Z Guide
Discover which child safety Products you really need to keep your child safe and which are just a waste of your time and money.
Child Safety Products A..to..Z Guide

Eat Like an Indian: The Real Paleo Diet Reviews

February 16, 2011
By

Eat Like an Indian: The Real Paleo Diet

Were we really “born broken” as we are so often led to believe? Do you, like most people, feel like you have to have a “scientist” tell you what you can or cannot eat? We like to think of ourselves as civilized, regarding people before us as living “nasty, brutish and short” lives. But was that really always so? This is straight dietary and nutritional information you need to survive and hang on to your health in today's world of conflicting medical and nutritional claims made by peo

List Price: $ 4.99 Price:

What’s in a word-especially a word like “fat”

January 22, 2011
By

So it’s not what you say, but how you say it, and when it comes to weight issues, there’s some good hard data now that shows the truth of that conventional wisdom.

The research, conducted at the University of Pennsylvania, focused specifically on the terminology used by doctors when discussing weight problems with overweight patients. But for anyone who has occasion to discuss weight or size with an overweight person, whether as a patient, an employee, a customer, or a loved one, there’s a useful lesson in the research: Don’t let your message get lost in your words.

It’s a sensitive issue. Terms for overweight have long been used in very negative ways, against almost anyone. ‘You big, fat ‘ is appended to the beginning of almost any schoolyard epithet: liar, bully, coward, braggart, etc., regardless of whether the subject is overweight or not. And if the subject is overweight, then ‘fat’ serves as an epithet all by itself.

Discriminatory treatment and pervasive prejudice against the overweight are well-documented among both children and adults, and negative attitudes about them are almost as universal as they are undeserved.

The truth is that overweight and obesity have long been seen as a moral or aesthetic failing. Gluttony, after all, is one of the seven deadly sins of biblical notoriety. But the causes of overweight in today’s society are a lot more complex than they were in biblical times.

Think about it. Back then, the physical requirements of everyday life ‘ including just getting a meal together ‘ were such that most people achieved an appropriate energy balance just getting by, day to day. That is, they burned about what they took in, and didn’t need to count calories or watch their carbs or worry about dietary fats.

In fact, it probably took some special indulgences to eat enough to get overweight. In a world where starvation or malnourishment was a far bigger risk than obesity, an overweight person might well be suspected of undue indulgence.

But we are not living in that world. The world has changed much, and so much in just the last few generations ‘with industrialization, mechanization, transportation, and marketing‘ that our progress has outpaced our ability to even recognize all its ramifications.

When Ray Kroc applied assembly line principles to burgers and fries at McDonald’s in the 1950s, who imagined that this convenient new dining would be, in just a couple generations, directly linked to an epidemic of obesity in America’

And it is an epidemic. Two-thirds of Americans are now overweight, one third are clinically obese. How can such numbers be attributed to a moral failing, to mere over-indulgence’ Particularly when so many among that number have been overweight since childhood, and so many children are among that number now’

Obesity is a medical problem, a public health problem. It does have behavioral aspects, but as more attention and resources are devoted to considering all its aspects, we learn every day how multifaceted and complex it really is.

Yet studies show that even medical professionals, who really should know better, are subject to the same negative stereotypes society in general assigns to overweight people: that they’re lazy, sloppy or undisciplined.

So is it any wonder that overweight people are sensitive about how their weight is characterized and referred to?

For instance, the word ‘obese,’ is really just a medical term, and a doctor might reasonably use it when talking to a patient about a weight problem. It defines a person who is 20 percent or more above the expected weight for their height. Typically, people with a body mass index of 30 or more are considered obese. And that’s all it means, nothing more.

But the negative connotations the word carries are so entrenched in the public psyche that the simple medical meaning is lost.

The Pennsylvania study on weight terminology quoted one female participant who had a BMI of 38. ‘I’m not obese,’ she said. ‘That’s for people who are really fat. It’s gross.’

‘Gross’ is a value judgment. ‘Obese’ is medical definition. But try telling that to her, or to any of the other overweight Americans whose body size is so often regarded ’even by them’as a reflection of their character.

Doctors need to know how patients hear these words, because if some emotional trigger causes the patient to tune out, the rest of a critical health message could be missed.

So the study set out a number of terms, many very similar, that a doctor might use in a discussion with a patient who was 50 pounds overweight, including ‘obesity,’ ‘weight problem,’ ‘excess weight,’ ‘large size,’ ‘heaviness,’ and simply ‘weight.’ Subjects in the study were asked to score them as desirable or undesirable along a range.

The simple term ‘weight,’ without any adjectives attached, was far and away the most preferred of those offered. The next favored terms, ‘excess weight’ and ‘BMI,’ weren’t even close, but still scored as desirable terms. Everything else was considered undesirable, with ‘obesity’ among the worst.

The research aimed at educating doctors to help improve ‘bedside manner.’ When getting heard can be a life or death matter, good doctors learn to tailor the message. They can’t afford to be offensive, even unintentionally, because critical medical guidance could get lost in a tangle of hurt feelings.

But there are important things that other people may need to say, too, and no one wants their words to obscure their message. Research like this helps us all communicate not just more considerately, but more effectively.

THROUGH THICK & THIN

While some size-acceptance activists are calling themselves fat and large-sized to try to remove the stigma by embracing these terms, most people aren’t yet going along. Research shows that if what you want is not to hurt, but to be heard, non-offensive, non-confrontational terminology is best.

About the author:
Caroline J. Cederquist, M.D. is a board certified Family Physician and a board certified Bariatric Physicians (the medical specialty of weight management). She specializes in lifetime weight management at the Cederquist Medical Wellness Center, her Naples, FL private practice, you can also get more information about Dr Cederquist and her weight management plan by visiting www.DietToYourDoor.com

She is the author of Helping Your Overweight Child – A Family Guide, which is available at, DrCederquist.com, Amazon.com, or by calling toll-free 1-800-431-1579.

The Truth About Food ~ How to Eat Like an Ape!

January 21, 2011
By

It’s pretty hard to work out what you can and can’t eat these days. Which is not a good situation given the alarming scale of obesity and chronic illness in the US and UK.

Can eating like an ape improve your health? Can natural nutrition reverse the effects of modern diets?

BBC2 decided to find out and got some volunteers to go ‘back to nature’…

The ‘Evo Diet’ Experiment

Take one zoo enclosure in Devon, England – only metres away from the great apes. Put in some huts and tents. Add 9 people with dangerously high blood pressure and cholesterol levels. Add a dietician prepared ape diet and then simmer for 12 days.

High blood pressure and cholesterol are high risk factors for heart disease and strokes. The program pointed the finger at too much saturated fat in modern diets which increase bad cholesterol. This sticks to the walls of arteries and eventually causes blockages, leading to heart attacks and strokes. Was 12 days enough to make any difference to this risky state of affairs?

The Diet

The diet goes back 6 million years – to when the evolution of man and the great apes diverged. At that time, it’s well accepted that we ate a largely vegetarian diet, pretty much as the great apes do today. 5Kg (11lb) / 2,300 calories per person of raw fruits, vegetables, and nuts / seeds were delivered in cool boxes. A single olive soaked in brine provided the salt allowance for each day.

In the second week, there was a nod to more recent changes in humans diets – from 3.5 million years ago to 350,000 years ago due to stone tools, hunting and fire. Some paleontologists believe that it was meat eating that increased our brain size and gave us the evolutionary edge. The volunteers got to go fishing and had a meal of fresh grilled mackerel – just the one meal then it was back to veggies. To put these time-scales in perspective, we saw that farming only occurred within the last 10,000 years and processed foods mainly within the last 100 years.

The beauty of a diet plan like this is that you eat it as it comes… no packaging, no preparation, no cooking and all the left-overs are biodegradable. But do we have all day to munch on raw food? How practical is it in the modern world?

The Results

What really surprised me was that there were no symptoms of detoxification, once the initial caffeine withdrawal was over. No moodiness or sickness at all, just lots of giggling going on. They seemed to be in very high spirits.

An unexpected side effect of the diet was weight loss. But then they didn’t finish their food, so you’d expect weight loss. By bedtime on the first day they were still munching away! Other side effects were lots of trips to the loo and lots of farting! :)

The results – staggering – an average of 23% reduction in cholesterol. Blood pressure returned to normal in everybody. And all this without any serious exercise, although we did see them kicking a ball about on one occasion.

One guy – the most worrying case of the group reported “lots of energy” and “sleeping well”. His insulin level went from 20.7 to 8!

The response in camp to the mackerel was very interesting – they were gagging for it! “Heaven”, “Delicious”, “I’m glad it was cooked, but if it wasn’t I probably would have gone for the raw method”.

Life and Death Stuff

It’s interesting to note that the volunteers looked healthy enough at the start and yet “their diet could be killing them”. It always pays to look beneath the surface of things where health is concerned.

The program showed how quickly health can change for the better given the right conditions. But make no mistake – this is life and death stuff we’re talking about. If these folks hadn’t changed, all the signs showed they were likely to develop life threatening conditions. Why wait ’til you have high blood pressure and cholesterol?

Conclusions

The program explained…

“Scientists believe that many of our modern health problems stem from a mismatch between what we ate as we evolved and the food we eat now”

I think it’s fair to say that many do. But this information also eludes many scientists and health professionals who don’t really consider the evolutionary picture when giving out health advice. This is a really under-studied area of nutrition.

This was a very light hearted look at our ape ancestry with a serious message. I think many people will have dismissed the program as a stunt and the diet as impractical but there are many folks following raw vegan ‘ape’ diets such as this. I’d like to see the actual list of food they ate. And I’d like to see longer term studies – over years, decades, exploring the whole evolutionary idea properly. I’d like studies adding animal foods into a diet like this to see the health impact. This is important stuff!

It’s a shame there wasn’t a real-life application of the ideas behind the diet, we weren’t left with much we could take away apart from ‘eat lots more fruit and veg’ :)

The most important thing about this program is the mainstream exposure. The idea of eating a diet of natural, healthy food, in a way that we evolved to eat, is now in the minds of a lot of people. Hoorah! :)

About the Author

Mike Kinnaird has studied health and nutrition for over 20 years, to overcome long-term chronic illness. Discover the 7 sure-fire steps to beating bad habits and kickstarting your health… To receive your free email mini-guide visit Passion for Health’s free natural health newsletter.

Simple Golf Swing Technique – Chip Like You Putt

January 2, 2011
By

When you are around the greens, try to chip like you putt. This simple golf swing technique can help you gain consistency and shave strokes off your game.

Many golfers who struggle with chip shots do so because they allow their wrists to break during the backswing. This leads to what is commonly referred to as “a classic chunk shot” or worse the dreaded skulling of the ball clear across the green. In either case, you are left with either another chip shot or a long putt.

Considering that 60 to 70 percent of shots taken on a golf course are inside of 100 yards, it is important to be able to adapt to different situations with ease. There are more shots lost around the putting surface than any other place on the course.

During a round of golf, most amateurs are faced with 6 to 8 shots from just off the green. The difference between par and bogey is often determined on how close you get the ball to the hole with these shots.
You have a much better chance of sinking a putt from 2, 3 or 4 feet than you do from 10, 12 or 15 feet.

If this is something that you contend with, then the simple golf swing technique I am about to share with you will make all the difference in the world.

Practice this simple golf swing technique and you are certain to shave 4 or 5 strokes off your score without making any other changes to your game.
Choke down on the club. I generally use a pitching wedge when chipping, but this does vary depending on how far I am from the hole.

Place the ball back in your stance just a bit behind center. My stance is narrower and the ball appears to be well back in my stance, but is really only about 2 inches or so off center.

Your hands should be forward of the ball. I find that because I am assuming more of a putting stance and posture, my hands will tend to be a few inches forward of center. This position will cause the clubface to close a bit and reduce the loft of the club.

Your eyes will be directly over the target line looking down on the ball.

Use your normal putting stroke taking the club straight back. Your stroke should go no further than the 7 o’clock position and following through to 5 o’clock. Don’t allow your wrists to break in either direction. The clubface should follow the target line from start to finish.

This stroke will cause the ball to pop into the air and land on the green with forward spin and should run out like a putt to the hole.

The only adjustment you may need to make would be which club you use. If you need to let the ball run a good way, then you may want to use a 7 or 8 iron.

We went over how to improve your consistency when chipping around the greens. Remember this simple golf swing technique and I am sure you will shave strokes off your game.

Discover Simple Golf Tips to Improve Your Game Overnight. Go to: http://SimpleGolfSwingAdvice.com

Clever Healthy Ways To Make Your Dog To Like His Food

November 30, 2010
By

It is funny to realize that there are a lot of dog owners out there who find it a challenge and definitely a major headache to feed their dog everyday. Like coaxing their kids to eat their food, a overly pampered dog also need coaxing before they eat up their food.

Most commercial dog food is unpalatable to dogs because they have relatively low fat contents that dogs hate. Adding some bribes like a little egg, a spoonful of cottage cheese or a dab of peanut butter might help on most days, but these bribes are fatty in nature and would add to the calories of your dog diet and make him fat in the long run.

There are many clever healthy ways to make your dog likes his food and this article will pretty much reveal them:

1. Adding a new texture – Frozen green beans or baby carrot will add a new texture to your dog’s food and add a different crunch to your dog’s food as well as a different flavor. Baby carrots has sugar content and its sweet flavor will appeal to most dog, but don’t worry about your dog having too much sugar in his diet as the sugar content is minimal and will not affect his health in any ways. As dogs have difficulties to digest uncooked whole carrots, they will even add roughage without adding calories.

You can also consider using other fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables, as they would also work in the same manner. For example, canned pumpkin, without any spices, can also be added to your dog’s food to make it more appealing.

2. Warming the food – Like human, most dogs prefer their food to be warm. Many dogs dislike the texture of dry commercial dog food and the feeling of cold food at room temperature. To help warm your dog food, you can add some water or low fat chicken or vegetable broth to his food to add moisture content (or to replace the moisture being lost) and then warm it in the microwave. This method is healthy, as liquid will not add calories to your dog’s diet but will help make the food taste better and encourage him to eat.

These are two of the most easy and healthy ways to make your dog food taste better. Take note that there are many reasons for a dog to refuse his food, he might be fighting a dominance battle for control, or he might just be sick and suffering from mouth disorder problems. If food refusals happen suddenly, or even when his favorite food is fed, health problems are very likely and a visit to the veterinary is recommended.

Moses Wright is the founder of http://www.Dog-Diet.net. You can find more helpful information on Canine Dog Diet, Natural Dog Food and Homemade Dog Food on his website. You are welcome to reprint this article if you keep the content and live link intact.

What’s in a word-especially a word like “fat”

November 14, 2010
By

So it’s not what you say, but how you say it, and when it comes to weight issues, there’s some good hard data now that shows the truth of that conventional wisdom.

The research, conducted at the University of Pennsylvania, focused specifically on the terminology used by doctors when discussing weight problems with overweight patients. But for anyone who has occasion to discuss weight or size with an overweight person, whether as a patient, an employee, a customer, or a loved one, there’s a useful lesson in the research: Don’t let your message get lost in your words.

It’s a sensitive issue. Terms for overweight have long been used in very negative ways, against almost anyone. ‘You big, fat ‘ is appended to the beginning of almost any schoolyard epithet: liar, bully, coward, braggart, etc., regardless of whether the subject is overweight or not. And if the subject is overweight, then ‘fat’ serves as an epithet all by itself.

Discriminatory treatment and pervasive prejudice against the overweight are well-documented among both children and adults, and negative attitudes about them are almost as universal as they are undeserved.

The truth is that overweight and obesity have long been seen as a moral or aesthetic failing. Gluttony, after all, is one of the seven deadly sins of biblical notoriety. But the causes of overweight in today’s society are a lot more complex than they were in biblical times.

Think about it. Back then, the physical requirements of everyday life ‘ including just getting a meal together ‘ were such that most people achieved an appropriate energy balance just getting by, day to day. That is, they burned about what they took in, and didn’t need to count calories or watch their carbs or worry about dietary fats.

In fact, it probably took some special indulgences to eat enough to get overweight. In a world where starvation or malnourishment was a far bigger risk than obesity, an overweight person might well be suspected of undue indulgence.

But we are not living in that world. The world has changed much, and so much in just the last few generations ‘with industrialization, mechanization, transportation, and marketing‘ that our progress has outpaced our ability to even recognize all its ramifications.

When Ray Kroc applied assembly line principles to burgers and fries at McDonald’s in the 1950s, who imagined that this convenient new dining would be, in just a couple generations, directly linked to an epidemic of obesity in America’

And it is an epidemic. Two-thirds of Americans are now overweight, one third are clinically obese. How can such numbers be attributed to a moral failing, to mere over-indulgence’ Particularly when so many among that number have been overweight since childhood, and so many children are among that number now’

Obesity is a medical problem, a public health problem. It does have behavioral aspects, but as more attention and resources are devoted to considering all its aspects, we learn every day how multifaceted and complex it really is.

Yet studies show that even medical professionals, who really should know better, are subject to the same negative stereotypes society in general assigns to overweight people: that they’re lazy, sloppy or undisciplined.

So is it any wonder that overweight people are sensitive about how their weight is characterized and referred to?

For instance, the word ‘obese,’ is really just a medical term, and a doctor might reasonably use it when talking to a patient about a weight problem. It defines a person who is 20 percent or more above the expected weight for their height. Typically, people with a body mass index of 30 or more are considered obese. And that’s all it means, nothing more.

But the negative connotations the word carries are so entrenched in the public psyche that the simple medical meaning is lost.

The Pennsylvania study on weight terminology quoted one female participant who had a BMI of 38. ‘I’m not obese,’ she said. ‘That’s for people who are really fat. It’s gross.’

‘Gross’ is a value judgment. ‘Obese’ is medical definition. But try telling that to her, or to any of the other overweight Americans whose body size is so often regarded ’even by them’as a reflection of their character.

Doctors need to know how patients hear these words, because if some emotional trigger causes the patient to tune out, the rest of a critical health message could be missed.

So the study set out a number of terms, many very similar, that a doctor might use in a discussion with a patient who was 50 pounds overweight, including ‘obesity,’ ‘weight problem,’ ‘excess weight,’ ‘large size,’ ‘heaviness,’ and simply ‘weight.’ Subjects in the study were asked to score them as desirable or undesirable along a range.

The simple term ‘weight,’ without any adjectives attached, was far and away the most preferred of those offered. The next favored terms, ‘excess weight’ and ‘BMI,’ weren’t even close, but still scored as desirable terms. Everything else was considered undesirable, with ‘obesity’ among the worst.

The research aimed at educating doctors to help improve ‘bedside manner.’ When getting heard can be a life or death matter, good doctors learn to tailor the message. They can’t afford to be offensive, even unintentionally, because critical medical guidance could get lost in a tangle of hurt feelings.

But there are important things that other people may need to say, too, and no one wants their words to obscure their message. Research like this helps us all communicate not just more considerately, but more effectively.

THROUGH THICK & THIN

While some size-acceptance activists are calling themselves fat and large-sized to try to remove the stigma by embracing these terms, most people aren’t yet going along. Research shows that if what you want is not to hurt, but to be heard, non-offensive, non-confrontational terminology is best.

About the author:
Caroline J. Cederquist, M.D. is a board certified Family Physician and a board certified Bariatric Physicians (the medical specialty of weight management). She specializes in lifetime weight management at the Cederquist Medical Wellness Center, her Naples, FL private practice, you can also get more information about Dr Cederquist and her weight management plan by visiting www.DietToYourDoor.com

She is the author of Helping Your Overweight Child – A Family Guide, which is available at, DrCederquist.com, Amazon.com, or by calling toll-free 1-800-431-1579.

What’s in a word-especially a word like “fat”

September 30, 2010
By

So it’s not what you say, but how you say it, and when it comes to weight issues, there’s some good hard data now that shows the truth of that conventional wisdom.

The research, conducted at the University of Pennsylvania, focused specifically on the terminology used by doctors when discussing weight problems with overweight patients. But for anyone who has occasion to discuss weight or size with an overweight person, whether as a patient, an employee, a customer, or a loved one, there’s a useful lesson in the research: Don’t let your message get lost in your words.

It’s a sensitive issue. Terms for overweight have long been used in very negative ways, against almost anyone. ‘You big, fat ‘ is appended to the beginning of almost any schoolyard epithet: liar, bully, coward, braggart, etc., regardless of whether the subject is overweight or not. And if the subject is overweight, then ‘fat’ serves as an epithet all by itself.

Discriminatory treatment and pervasive prejudice against the overweight are well-documented among both children and adults, and negative attitudes about them are almost as universal as they are undeserved.

The truth is that overweight and obesity have long been seen as a moral or aesthetic failing. Gluttony, after all, is one of the seven deadly sins of biblical notoriety. But the causes of overweight in today’s society are a lot more complex than they were in biblical times.

Think about it. Back then, the physical requirements of everyday life ‘ including just getting a meal together ‘ were such that most people achieved an appropriate energy balance just getting by, day to day. That is, they burned about what they took in, and didn’t need to count calories or watch their carbs or worry about dietary fats.

In fact, it probably took some special indulgences to eat enough to get overweight. In a world where starvation or malnourishment was a far bigger risk than obesity, an overweight person might well be suspected of undue indulgence.

But we are not living in that world. The world has changed much, and so much in just the last few generations ‘with industrialization, mechanization, transportation, and marketing‘ that our progress has outpaced our ability to even recognize all its ramifications.

When Ray Kroc applied assembly line principles to burgers and fries at McDonald’s in the 1950s, who imagined that this convenient new dining would be, in just a couple generations, directly linked to an epidemic of obesity in America’

And it is an epidemic. Two-thirds of Americans are now overweight, one third are clinically obese. How can such numbers be attributed to a moral failing, to mere over-indulgence’ Particularly when so many among that number have been overweight since childhood, and so many children are among that number now’

Obesity is a medical problem, a public health problem. It does have behavioral aspects, but as more attention and resources are devoted to considering all its aspects, we learn every day how multifaceted and complex it really is.

Yet studies show that even medical professionals, who really should know better, are subject to the same negative stereotypes society in general assigns to overweight people: that they’re lazy, sloppy or undisciplined.

So is it any wonder that overweight people are sensitive about how their weight is characterized and referred to?

For instance, the word ‘obese,’ is really just a medical term, and a doctor might reasonably use it when talking to a patient about a weight problem. It defines a person who is 20 percent or more above the expected weight for their height. Typically, people with a body mass index of 30 or more are considered obese. And that’s all it means, nothing more.

But the negative connotations the word carries are so entrenched in the public psyche that the simple medical meaning is lost.

The Pennsylvania study on weight terminology quoted one female participant who had a BMI of 38. ‘I’m not obese,’ she said. ‘That’s for people who are really fat. It’s gross.’

‘Gross’ is a value judgment. ‘Obese’ is medical definition. But try telling that to her, or to any of the other overweight Americans whose body size is so often regarded ’even by them’as a reflection of their character.

Doctors need to know how patients hear these words, because if some emotional trigger causes the patient to tune out, the rest of a critical health message could be missed.

So the study set out a number of terms, many very similar, that a doctor might use in a discussion with a patient who was 50 pounds overweight, including ‘obesity,’ ‘weight problem,’ ‘excess weight,’ ‘large size,’ ‘heaviness,’ and simply ‘weight.’ Subjects in the study were asked to score them as desirable or undesirable along a range.

The simple term ‘weight,’ without any adjectives attached, was far and away the most preferred of those offered. The next favored terms, ‘excess weight’ and ‘BMI,’ weren’t even close, but still scored as desirable terms. Everything else was considered undesirable, with ‘obesity’ among the worst.

The research aimed at educating doctors to help improve ‘bedside manner.’ When getting heard can be a life or death matter, good doctors learn to tailor the message. They can’t afford to be offensive, even unintentionally, because critical medical guidance could get lost in a tangle of hurt feelings.

But there are important things that other people may need to say, too, and no one wants their words to obscure their message. Research like this helps us all communicate not just more considerately, but more effectively.

THROUGH THICK & THIN

While some size-acceptance activists are calling themselves fat and large-sized to try to remove the stigma by embracing these terms, most people aren’t yet going along. Research shows that if what you want is not to hurt, but to be heard, non-offensive, non-confrontational terminology is best.

About the author:
Caroline J. Cederquist, M.D. is a board certified Family Physician and a board certified Bariatric Physicians (the medical specialty of weight management). She specializes in lifetime weight management at the Cederquist Medical Wellness Center, her Naples, FL private practice, you can also get more information about Dr Cederquist and her weight management plan by visiting www.DietToYourDoor.com

She is the author of Helping Your Overweight Child – A Family Guide, which is available at, DrCederquist.com, Amazon.com, or by calling toll-free 1-800-431-1579.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Local Events, Concerts, Tickets
Events by Eventful