Posts Tagged ‘ Drugs ’

Cure Restless Leg Today without drugs, supplements, or diet changes.

February 23, 2011
By

Cure Restless Leg Today without drugs, supplements, or diet changes.
Cure your Restless Leg Syndrome naturally, anywhere anytime with a 100% success rate–guaranteed.
Cure Restless Leg Today without drugs, supplements, or diet changes.

Fat To Buff.
Burn 50 Pounds Of Fat Without Supplements.
Fat To Buff.

Molluscum Cure! Hot Niche!
A guide with a proven treatment for Molluscum Contagiosum. The guide covers supplements and has a daily routine to get yourself cured.
Molluscum Cure! Hot Niche!

How To Correctly withdraw from drugs at home

February 17, 2011
By

bit.ly Learn About ✔ How to safely detox at home especially from drugs like methadone, benzodiazepines, alcohol, suboxone, oxycontin, cocaine, crack, heroin, crystal meth, pain killers… ✔ How to prepare your body before withdrawal and dramatically lower withdrawal symptoms. ✔ The dangers of withdrawing from methadone, benzodiazepines, alcohol, crack, cocaine and opiates, and how to avoid them. ✔ What to expect when going through withdrawal. ✔ How to make withdrawal easier and safer. ✔ The best way to overcome sleeplessness when withdrawing. ✔ How to alleviate depression when withdrawing. ✔ What factors could cause you to have more severe withdrawal symptoms and what step to take to address them before attempting withdrawal. ✔ Whether you can die from methadone withdrawal. ✔ The difference between withdraw, detox and rehab. ✔ What to look for when comparing detox centers. ✔ Why some have more severe withdrawal symptoms than others and how to best avoid them. ✔ steps to take to avoid panic attacks ✔ The one mistake that others do that intensify their withdrawal symptoms and cause them to fail. ✔ How bad are methadone withdrawal symptoms when the right steps are NOT taken ✔ What could cause death from methadone withdrawal and how to avoid it—it’s not what you think. ✔ What could have caused your depression, low energy and many other symptoms that led you to abuse drugs and alcohol and what you could do to resolve these factors BEFORE attempting withdrawal
Video Rating: 2 / 5

METHADONE: An entry from Macmillan Reference USA’s Encyclopedia of Drugs, Alcohol and Addictive Behavior

February 16, 2011
By

METHADONE: An entry from Macmillan Reference USA's Encyclopedia of Drugs, Alcohol and Addictive Behavior

This second edition of the “Encyclopedia of Drugs, Alcohol, and Addictive Behavior” reflects changes in the attitudes about, use, and knowledge of drugs and alcohol since the first edition published in 1995. These changes include the decrease of crack cocaine use and resurgence of heroin use; changes in laws dealing with drug use (on both the state and national levels), and new discoveries leading to a better understanding of how drugs work and what makes them addictive. More than 700 articl

List Price: $ 1.45 Price: $ 1.45


Withdrawal from methadone maintenance: Rate of withdrawal and expectation (DHEW publication ; no)

Price:

More Methadone And Withdrawal Products

How Safe Are Prescription Topical Non – Steroidal Drugs… Particularly in the Elderly?

January 21, 2011
By

The treatment of osteoarthritis, to date, is essentially palliative.

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease where the articular cartilage- the gristle that caps the ends of long bones wears away. More than 20 million Americans suffer from osteoarthritis, making it the most common form of arthritis.

While the therapeutic approach varies from practitioner to practitioner, the general thrust is similar.

Patients are treated with analgesics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, injections of glucocorticoids, injections of hyaluronic acid (“rooster comb”) lubricants, and then have surgery.
In patients with relatively mild disease, physicians may also prescribe topical agents.

Many doctors feel that topical non-steroidal drugs may be safer to use than oral anti-inflammatory drugs.

A recent study assessed the efficacy and safety of diclofenac gel in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee in people aged 65 and older. This was actually a compilation of data from three large randomized studies that enrolled a total of 538 patients. Four hundred and thirty three of the volunteers had associated medical problems such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. The data was reported by Dr. H. Richard Barthel and colleagues at the annual meeting of the American Medical Directors Association.

The patients applied either the topical diclofenac gel in a dose of four grams per day or placebo.

The time frame evaluated was 12 weeks of therapy.

Analysis of the data showed that 56 per cent of the patients who received diclofenac gel had side effects compared with 44 per cent of the placebo group.

One patient, an 80-year old woman, developed a blood clot in the leg and a subsequent pulmonary embolism that was felt to possibly be related to drug therapy.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease, particularly in older individuals with an underlying history of hypertension, diabetes, and other cardiovascular disease.

The systemic absorption of topical diclofenac gel is forty times less than the absorption of oral diclofenac according to Dr. Roy Altman, professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. While topical agents may reduce the risk of these problems compared with oral preparations, they do not eliminate them totally.

Also found in the analysis was a much higher rate of skin reactions related to the diclofenac gel. Reactions at the site of application occurred in 8.8 per cent of diclofenac gel patients and only 1.1 per cent of placebo treated patients.

Adverse cardiovascular problems occurred in 2.6 per cent of the diclofenac patients versus 1.1 per cent of placebo treated patients.

Besides the currently available Volteren gel, another recent FDA approved topical preparation is Pennsaid, another diclofenac-based rub.

Another set of studies on Pennsaid, another topical diclofenac preparation, that uses DMSO for penetration, showed efficacy in at least two more studies presented at the American College of Rheumatology meetings in Atlanta, Georgia, from November 7 to November 11. Side effects were generally similar to that of the gel preparation.

In addition, Lidoderm patches were demonstrated to be effective for pain relief in one study of knee arthritis presented at the same meeting. Side effects were few.

While studies like this are interesting, they show the relative inadequacy of current treatment available for osteoarthritis. Pain relief is available but cartilage restoration is still not generally available. Recent data on mesenchymal stem cells does look promising as a method for restoring articular cartilage.

Natural Male Enhancement Instead Of Prescription Drugs For Male Impotence

January 2, 2011
By

The cost of a prescription drug for male impotence has to certainly be overwhelming for anyone with erectile dysfunction. While you may not be able to stop using a male enhancement as a treatment, perhaps you may wish to consider a less costly alternative with a natural dietary supplement. Erectile dysfunction or male impotence has treatment options and for many men it is necessary to maintain a healthy sexual lifestyle.

Erectile dysfunction or male sexual impotence is a sexual dysfunction characterized by the inability to develop or maintain an erection of the penis for sexual intercourse. Erectile dysfunction is different from other conditions that interfere with sexual intercourse, such as lack of sexual desire and problems with ejaculation and orgasm. Men are able to ejaculate without an erection; however, erectile dysfunction is regardless of the capability of ejaculation.

It can be examined at different level that comprises psychology and medical reason. If a person is not sexually aroused even when he commits himself, it can be defined as erectile dysfunction. ED is constant inability of generating and maintaining erection hard enough to penetrate. It can occur at any age but ED loves to attack people in there fifties. Everyone faces an occasional stint of ED. As one grows old he can experience the change in erection function. It is natural and nothing to worry about because natural male enhancement has arrived to save men from getting embarrassed in bedroom.

Pfizer introduced oral pill Viagra in 1998 and it created uproar, which is contrary to the reaction generally related with a launch of any usual medication. Since then more then 23 million people have been put it to good use. Different pharmaceutical companies have launched generic version of Viagra and dietary supplements using natural herbs from Asia have also been marketed. They are just as safe and effective as the prescription drug. Doctors worldwide are prescribing generic Viagra to all those suffering from ED. The results have been encouraging and these men have enjoyed their sexual lives as before.

Herbal treatment for natural male enhancement is generally useful and highly-praised. These herbal dietary supplements for erectile dysfunction or male impotence come in easy to use tablets. Most patients can start by taking those 20 minutes before starting any sexually activity and the effect of all the natural male enhancement lasts up to days from a single dose. This does not mean you are erect for that amount of time, but the effects allow you to become erect at will up to four days.

There is no food restriction when it comes of using natural male enhancement, but there is a possibility that it may take a little longer to show its effect if it is taken after a high fat meals like fish, cheeseburger, french-fries etc. One benefit of herbal dietary supplements for erectile dysfunction or male impotence is that you are able to take these natural male enhancement tablets with alcohol. Additionally you will find that there are no side effects as with many of the prescription drugs.

Lets summarize some of the benefits of natural male enhancement over prescription drugs.

1.) You do not need a prescription because they are herbal in nature and not currently regulated by prescription and FDA laws. This also means you do not need to visit a doctor, and can get these types of products online discreetly shipped directly to you.
2.) Some of the common side effects of prescription sexual dysfunction or enhancement products are: headaches, flushing, stomach ache, and changes in vision. Also, these medications are to be approached with much caution since they have been linked to heart attacks.

3.) With a natural product, you can be sure you will gain additional benefits from a male enhancement product, due to the ingredients used. Many of the ingredients play dual roles in enhancing sex, as well as providing additional energy and being a natural “youth” remedy. A lot of men report having a renewed sense of vitality and having desires they may not have felt in months or even years.

4.) Cost. Currently even the cheapest online pharmacies Generic male enhancement offerings are around $160 for just 90 tablets. They can cost much more than this depending on where they are purchased. Many people shy away from online medical pharmacies due to their reputation for diluted or inactive products, so this option is not even advisable.

One thing we would like to remind is to always enjoy safe sex and for those who are suffering from erectile dysfunction or male impotence, enjoy a healthy sexual lifestyle with herbal dietary supplement for natural male enhancement.

The Ultimate Fast Acting Natural Male Enhancement for Impotence or Erectile Dysfunction
Vicerex helps men with male impotence, erectile dysfunction with a natural male enhancement dietary supplement for penis enhancement for better sexual relations with couples.

FDA Committee Recommends Warnings on ADHD Drugs

November 30, 2010
By

The Food and Drug Administration recently asked a scientific panel to consider ways of studying drugs used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The drugs studied included amphetamines such as Adderall, and methylphenidates, sold as Ritalin, Concerta, Methylin, and Metadate. Data gathered by the agency’s own studies suggested a link between the drugs and an increased risk of sudden death and serious cardiovascular problems. To confirm their findings, the agency decided to seek outside corroboration from a Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committee.

A federal health official said that the FDA’s research shows there is a strong possibility that the drugs may be linked to the deaths of 25 people between 1999 and 2003. Of those deaths, 19 were children. The research also discussed 54 cases of serious cardiovascular problems in adults and children being treated with the drugs, including heart attack, stroke, hypertension, palpitations, and arrhythmias. An additional 26 deaths were counted between 1969 and 2003 due to deaths by suicide, intentional overdose, drowning, heat stroke, and other disease.

The FDA’s Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committee reviewed different ways to study whether or not the deaths could be attributable to the use of the ADHD drugs. Some of the patients already had heart problems or high blood pressure, but the findings on the whole warranted further investigation. Dr. David Graham of the FDA explained the concern by saying, “There’s smoke. Does that represent a fire?” Graham added, “Because adults have a higher risk of heart disease and stroke to begin with, any increase in risk caused by these drugs could affect a large number of people.”

As a result of the committee’s research, federal science advisors voted 8-7 to recommend that the most stringent type of warning labels be added to containers of Ritalin and other stimulants used to treat ADHD. The committee’s recommendation suggested that manufacturers should add the same type of “black box” safety warnings already used on drugs that can cause potentially fatal side effects. The committee was just an advisory body and the FDA isn’t required to follow their recommendations, but it usually does. Panel member Dr. Curt Furberg cautioned that it would be “inappropriate, unethical behavior” if the FDA decided not to disclose the uncertainty about ADHD drug safety to physicians and patients. The drugs already have warnings related to possible risks to patients with heart defects, but the FDA’s Dr. Gerald DalPan said prior to the votes that the agency felt “this warning is appropriate given our current knowledge of these drugs.”

Doctors prescribe ADHD medications to about 2 million children and 1 million adults every month, and those numbers are increasing. According to IMS Health, a pharmaceutical information firm, sales of ADHD drugs increased to $3.1 billion in 2004, from $759 million in 2000. The few studies available providing data on longer-term use of ADHD drugs provide very little information on the risks evaluated by the committee. But analysis of the reports of death and injury suggest a possible link between the drugs and cardiovascular conditions. However, because the link is not conclusive, the FDA’s Dr. Kate Gelperin told the panel that the possible link “is really a question we’d like to have answered.”

The Canadian equivalent of the US FDA removed the ADHD drug Adderall XR, a generic version of Ritalin, from their market last year while risk analysis studies were being done. A Canadian panel eventually decided that there was not enough evidence of risk to ban the drug, and the FDA reached a similar conclusion at the same time.

Natural Male Enhancement Instead Of Prescription Drugs For Male Impotence

October 29, 2010
By

The cost of a prescription drug for male impotence has to certainly be overwhelming for anyone with erectile dysfunction. While you may not be able to stop using a male enhancement as a treatment, perhaps you may wish to consider a less costly alternative with a natural dietary supplement. Erectile dysfunction or male impotence has treatment options and for many men it is necessary to maintain a healthy sexual lifestyle.

Erectile dysfunction or male sexual impotence is a sexual dysfunction characterized by the inability to develop or maintain an erection of the penis for sexual intercourse. Erectile dysfunction is different from other conditions that interfere with sexual intercourse, such as lack of sexual desire and problems with ejaculation and orgasm. Men are able to ejaculate without an erection; however, erectile dysfunction is regardless of the capability of ejaculation.

It can be examined at different level that comprises psychology and medical reason. If a person is not sexually aroused even when he commits himself, it can be defined as erectile dysfunction. ED is constant inability of generating and maintaining erection hard enough to penetrate. It can occur at any age but ED loves to attack people in there fifties. Everyone faces an occasional stint of ED. As one grows old he can experience the change in erection function. It is natural and nothing to worry about because natural male enhancement has arrived to save men from getting embarrassed in bedroom.

Pfizer introduced oral pill Viagra in 1998 and it created uproar, which is contrary to the reaction generally related with a launch of any usual medication. Since then more then 23 million people have been put it to good use. Different pharmaceutical companies have launched generic version of Viagra and dietary supplements using natural herbs from Asia have also been marketed. They are just as safe and effective as the prescription drug. Doctors worldwide are prescribing generic Viagra to all those suffering from ED. The results have been encouraging and these men have enjoyed their sexual lives as before.

Herbal treatment for natural male enhancement is generally useful and highly-praised. These herbal dietary supplements for erectile dysfunction or male impotence come in easy to use tablets. Most patients can start by taking those 20 minutes before starting any sexually activity and the effect of all the natural male enhancement lasts up to days from a single dose. This does not mean you are erect for that amount of time, but the effects allow you to become erect at will up to four days.

There is no food restriction when it comes of using natural male enhancement, but there is a possibility that it may take a little longer to show its effect if it is taken after a high fat meals like fish, cheeseburger, french-fries etc. One benefit of herbal dietary supplements for erectile dysfunction or male impotence is that you are able to take these natural male enhancement tablets with alcohol. Additionally you will find that there are no side effects as with many of the prescription drugs.

Lets summarize some of the benefits of natural male enhancement over prescription drugs.

1.) You do not need a prescription because they are herbal in nature and not currently regulated by prescription and FDA laws. This also means you do not need to visit a doctor, and can get these types of products online discreetly shipped directly to you.
2.) Some of the common side effects of prescription sexual dysfunction or enhancement products are: headaches, flushing, stomach ache, and changes in vision. Also, these medications are to be approached with much caution since they have been linked to heart attacks.

3.) With a natural product, you can be sure you will gain additional benefits from a male enhancement product, due to the ingredients used. Many of the ingredients play dual roles in enhancing sex, as well as providing additional energy and being a natural “youth” remedy. A lot of men report having a renewed sense of vitality and having desires they may not have felt in months or even years.

4.) Cost. Currently even the cheapest online pharmacies Generic male enhancement offerings are around $160 for just 90 tablets. They can cost much more than this depending on where they are purchased. Many people shy away from online medical pharmacies due to their reputation for diluted or inactive products, so this option is not even advisable.

One thing we would like to remind is to always enjoy safe sex and for those who are suffering from erectile dysfunction or male impotence, enjoy a healthy sexual lifestyle with herbal dietary supplement for natural male enhancement.

The Ultimate Fast Acting Natural Male Enhancement for Impotence or Erectile Dysfunction
Vicerex helps men with male impotence, erectile dysfunction with a natural male enhancement dietary supplement for penis enhancement for better sexual relations with couples.

Online integrity about prescription drugs

October 29, 2010
By
Online integrity about prescription drugsEnlarge Image

Honesty on the Internet? Many would take it as a joke of the day. It’s not that internet is full of unscrupulous, diehard cheats. It’s simply the latter who are also in appreciable numbers. This can be more said with substance and hence belief when it comes online pharmacies. There are scores of them, with flowery language and promising stars.

When it comes to drugs, it’s not uncommon that many such pharmacies would not disclose full information about a certain formulation. That would amount to almost saying a lie. But there is one online pharmacy that has earned rare accolades for being transparent to the point of calling spade a spade, no matter what it turns out for its business. At Walgreens it is like entering a bricks and mortar store. It is like asking for a product you need and just like even feeling it.

Customer Respect Group, an independent customer body, vouches for the practices of Walgreens like “customer responsiveness, ease of use and consumer privacy.” After having made a thumping beginning with 1.6 million hits on the launch of their website, they have already gone past close to 12 million hits. On user-friendliness, Walgreens are targeting their online services to different lingual groups. Hence it is the first website to have launched its online operations for spanish-speaking population of the world.
The ease with which one can navigate the site goes through the range of its products, is an experience in itself and is about what an online pharmacy should be like. The purchase is easy too and customer privacy is another point the site scores over a lot among its likes.

The site processes about 20,000 purchases every day, which speaks for its popularity and business integrity. So all your online prescriptions – be it Viagra, Cialis, Phentermine, can be handled with safety.

Author Information:
Antony Virgese is an associated editor to the website: www.i-pharmacy.md – The Online Prescriptions Portal. I-Pharmacy.md is committed to provide visitors with complete information on Viagra, Cialis, Phentermine and all Diet Pills. Your Feedback will be highly appreciated at partner@i-pharmacy.md.

The Instinct to Heal: Curing Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Without Drugs and Without Talk Therapy

October 25, 2010
By

By David Servan-Schreiber, M.D., PH.D.
Published by Rodale
February 2004; $23.95US/$34.95CAN; 1-57954-902-0

Americans seek therapy in record numbers and consume more medications than ever before, yet stress, anxiety, and depression continue to rise to epidemic proportions. People can spend years on the psychoanalytic couch without making any progress. And for many psychiatrists, the prescription-writing reflex has become almost automatic, despite the fact that benefits often disappear as soon as drug treatment stops. Standard treatments simply aren’t long-term solutions.

But psychiatrist/neurologist David Servan-Schreiber, M.D., Ph.D., knows that we can cure our emotional pain. He’s seen certain natural methods produce tremendous results in his clinical practice, in that of his peers, and even in war-torn regions where horrific memories can leave deep scars.

Numerous studies in prestigious scientific journals have documented the amazing benefits of these methods on anxiety and depression, but because the mechanisms through which they operate remain poorly understood, they’ve remained largely excluded from mainstream medicine and psychiatry. Dr. Servan-Schreiber explains how each of the natural methods in this ensemble treatment plan can help us escape the therapy/drug trap by working through the body to tap into the emotional brain’s self-healing processes rather than relying on the cognitive process of language.

Weaving fascinating accounts of his first-hand experience and findings together with the research of hundreds of other esteemed scientists, Dr. Servan-Schreiber outlines a program that’s becoming embraced throughout the world as a permanent cure for emotional pain. See how you, too, can tap into The Instinct to Heal.

Author

David Servan-Schreiber, M.D., PH.D., is clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and cofounder of the Center for Complementary Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. He codirected a National Institutes of Health laboratory for the study of clinical cognitive neuroscience and functional neuroimaging for several years and has published more than 90 scientific monographs. He’s lectured at leading international academic centers, including Stanford, Columbia, Cornell, and Cambridge Universities. One of the original seven members of the United States board of Doctors Without Borders/Médicins Sans Frontières, he served on the board for 9 years and provided medical relief in Kurdistan, Guatemala, India, Tajikistan, and Kosovo. He continues to develop mental health interventions for victims of crises and to train therapists in crisis areas.

For more information, please visit the author’s website at www.instincttoheal.org or www.writtenvoices.com

Reviews

“David Servan-Schreiber has done a brilliant job of bringing together insights and information of vital importance for well-being. The Instinct to Heal is itself an instrument of healing.”

–Daniel Goleman, PH.D., bestselling author of Emotional Intelligence

“The scientist and physician David Servan-Schreiber has provided a wonderful manual to help reconcile our emotional and rational brains . . . [he] bases his advice about how to improve our lives on a profound understanding of how the human brain works, on a broad synthesis of the latest knowledge in neuropsychology, as well as his own clinical and research experience. The book is deeply satisfying intellectually, yet crystal-clear and user-friendly . . .Written with grace and elegance, this book might well become the most important mental health landmark of this generation.”

–Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, PH.D., bestselling author of Flow, Being Adolescent, The Evolving Self, and Creativity

The Instinct to Heal is a fascinating account of unorthodox approaches to treating the emotional brain and mind. I learned a lot.”

–Joseph LeDoux, PH.D., the Henry and Lucy Moses Professor of Science at New York University and author of The Emotional Brain and Synaptic Self

The Instinct to Heal is an inspiring overview of the internal healing potential that exists within everyone — and that this potential is our birthright and is not dependent on drugs, surgical procedures, or high-tech manipulations . . . The Instinct to Heal will help anyone expand their concepts of health and health care to a more majestic level.”

–Larry Dossey, M.D., bestselling author of Healing Beyond the Body, Reinventing Medicine, and Healing Words

“A brilliant, absorbing synthesis of science, experience, and thought by an internationally known neuroscientist and clinician . . . essential reading for all those who want to understand the frontiers of mind-body health.”

–Michael Lerner, PH.D., author of Choices in Healing

“David Servan-Schreiber is one of those rare scientists who truly listens with his heart and perceives the larger connection.”

–Gerald G. Jampolsky, M.D., bestselling author of Love is Letting Go of Fear

“This book, the translation of research findings into meaningful clinical insights and practice, bears the unmistakable signature of Dr. Servan-Schreiber’s unique abilities and voice, which echo with humor, wisdom, and compassion . . . David used to talk often about the great masters, such as Erikson, whom he admired specifically for their combination of intellectual prowess, personal depth, and caring disposition. I was able to understand exactly what he meant, for I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to observe, in him, a young example of just such greatness.”

–Jonathan D. Cohen, M.D., PH.D., director of the Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior at Princeton University

“This book has love on every page.”

–Professor Francine Lecas, chair of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Sick Children Hospital, Paris, France

“Dr. Servan-Schreiber is sending an important message to those talking therapists who appear to rely on the rational brain and language as the sole route to our emotions. This timely and comprehensive review opens many doors and may be read with pleasure by a wide audience.”

–Judith S. Schachter, M.D., past president of the American Psychoanalytic Association

“Why is The Instinct to Heal such a success anywhere it has been published? Because people are eager to find new ways to deal with the wear and tear of coping with a stressful social environment; and because this book, written by a traditionally-trained psychiatrist who dares to think untraditionally, offers an alternative that may work, and, by so doing, offers hope.”

–Antonio Damasio, M.D., PH.D., author of Looking For Spinoza, The Feeling of What Happens, and Descartes’ Error

“Servan-Schreiber’s stunning book takes a leap beyond conventional psychiatry and integrates contemporary neuroscience research with a deep understanding of the emotional brain’s innate tendency to heal. He shows how one can ‘reprogram’ the emotional brain so that it adapts to the present, instead of continuing to be stuck in one’s painful past. In this book, he shows that for healing to occur, one needs to not exclusively depend on traditional methods of language and understanding, but directly influence the emotional brain by acting directly on bodily experience.”

–Bessel Van Der Kolk, M.D., professor of psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine

The Instinct to Heal is engaging and highly readable, and packed with concrete suggestions about how to relieve stress, anxiety, and depression. Servan-Schreiber’s advice is culled from top-notch scientific journals and his years of clinical and scientific experience. His accounts of patients, along with his easy narrative style, help readers see beyond the research studies he cites.”

–Robin S. Rosenberg, PH.D., clinical psychologist and coauthor of Psychology: The Brain, The Person, The World

Excerpt

The following is an excerpt from the book The Instinct to Heal: Curing Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Without Drugs and Without Talk Therapy

by David Servan-Schreiber, M.D., PH.D.

Published by Rodale; February 2004; $23.95US/$34.95CAN; 1-57954-902-0

Copyright © 2004 David Servan-Schreiber

Animals Can Heal Us, Too

At the hospital where I practiced in Pittsburgh, other physicians often asked my advice before discharging a depressed elderly patient after bypass surgery or hospitalization for a fractured hip. Usually, I was the last person they consulted. The colleagues preceding me had already prescribed a long list of medicines: antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, antacid. They expected me to carry the ball and add my own “anti” to the list — an antidepressant or anxiolytic (anti-anxiety medication).

Often, however, the cause of depression was clear. The old man or woman had been living alone for years, and was no longer going out very much because of frail health. No longer playing bingo with friends. No longer being visited by their children or grandchildren, who had left for California, Boston, or New York. These men and women were idling away the hours in front of television screens. Would these patients honestly feel like looking after themselves? Even if antidepressants could have done them good, would they have taken them every day? Probably no more than those other pills, already so hard to distinguish from each other and to take as prescribed.

I really did not feel like adding my two-cents’ worth to that confusion. Medicines are not “limbic regulators.” So, summoning up all my courage, I would add my recommendation to the patient’s medical record: “As far as her depression is concerned, the best thing for this patient would be to get a dog (a small one, obviously, to minimize the risk of a fall). If the patient considers that would be too much work, a cat would do, since it does not need to be taken out. And if a cat still seems too much, a bird or a fish. Finally, if the patient still refuses, then a houseplant.”

At the beginning of this campaign, I received slightly irritated calls from the residents in orthopedic or cardiovascular surgery: “We asked you to recommend an antidepressant, not a zoo. What are we going to write on the discharge prescription? There aren’t any household pets at the pharmacy.”

However I answered, my explanations seemed convincing only to myself. My colleagues invariably ended up prescribing an antidepressant themselves, mumbling about how useless psychiatrists really were. They were undoubtedly convinced that they were defending the cause of modern scientific medicine against the ever-threatening, obscuring specter of “old-wives’ remedies.”

I soon realized that my approach was not working and that I was doing damage to my reputation as chief of the psychiatry division of the hospital. Instead of backing down, I prepared a document summing up various scientific studies on the question. From that point on, I attached the document to my recommendations in the patient’s record.

I hoped to inform my colleagues of certain remarkable results with which they didn’t seem to be familiar, such as one study from the American Journal of Cardiology about men and women whose infarctions had been accompanied by dangerous arrhythmias. The patients were tracked for more than a year, and those who had had a household pet faced only one-sixth the likelihood of dying during the year compared to all the others. Or yet another study, in which older people with household pets had much better psychological resistance to life’s difficulties and went a lot less often to the doctor’s. I also called their attention to a study from a group at Harvard showing that simply looking after a plant lowered the mortality rate of residents in a retirement home by 50 percent. I cited research on AIDS patients showing that cat or dog owners were better protected from depression. Finally, I referred to the font of all knowledge in my colleagues’ eyes — the Journal of the American Medical Association. In 1996, it published a study about handicapped people who were virtually unable to move around unaided, very similar to the elderly patients I had been asked to see. This study showed that these people were happier and had greater self-esteem and a distinctly larger network of friends and relations if they had the companionship of a dog. In fact, another study found that the mere presence of an animal by your side makes you “more attractive” to others.

Even stockbrokers feel better if they have a household pet. With one of the most stressful professions imaginable, they are constant victims of market ups and downs over which they have no control, yet they still have to meet their sales targets. It is hardly surprising that a good many of them suffer early from high blood pressure. Karen Allen, Ph.D., from the University of Buffalo, conducted an unconventional study on a group of brokers in her city. Antihypertensive medications brought their blood pressure down below the initial alarming average of 160/100. However, in moments of stress, they still showed sudden peaks of blood pressure above those numbers.

To a randomly selected half of the stockbrokers, Dr. Allen allocated either a dog or a cat. (They had the opportunity to choose one or the other.) Six months later, the results spoke for themselves: Those who had received household pets were no longer reacting to stress in the same way. Not only had their blood pressure stabilized, even in periods of stress, but their performance on stress-inducing tasks — such as rapid mental arithmetic and public speaking — was significantly better. They made fewer mistakes, suggesting that they had more control over their emotions and thus over their concentration. In another study, Dr. Allen was able to show that older women (over 70) who lived alone but with pets had the same blood pressure as women of 25 with active social lives.

My “enclosure” turned out to be effective. After that, nobody ever made the slightest comment. I no longer heard interns snicker behind my back when I left one of my “zoological” recommendations in their patient’s file. On the other hand, alas, I do not think that a single patient ever went home with a cat or without his or her prescription for Prozac. The idea that a loving relationship is in itself a physiological remedy, comparable to taking medication, rests on sound scientific ground — but it simply has not yet taken hold in the medical establishment.

Reprinted from: Instinct to Heal: Curing Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Without Drugs and Without Talk Therapy by David Servan-Schreiber, M.D., Ph.D. © 2003, 2004 by David Servan-Schreiber, M.D. Permission granted by Rodale, Inc., Emmaus, PA 18098. Available wherever books are sold or directly from the publisher by calling (800) 848-4735 or visit their website at www.rodalestore.com.

For more information, please visit the author’s website at www.instincttoheal.org or www.writtenvoices.com

Supplements vs Drugs and a Playing Field as Level as the Deck of the Titanic

October 25, 2010
By

We can all agree that it is important to ensure consumers have safe products. And we also tend to believe that our government, acting in our interests, has in place legislation, standards and bodies that guarantee such safety.

Unfortunately, when you look closely at the status quo, you discover that this is not so. Government is certainly protecting someone’s interests but that someone is not the consumer and very often governmental action or inaction in this regard directly strikes against the well being of the consumer.

It is my contention that we will continue to be in grave jeopardy and freedom will continue to elude us so long as we cling, all the evidence to the contrary, to the belief that our government is on our side or will do anything about certain large corporations that do not actually give a damn whether we live or die.

To get an idea of how insidious this is, it is worth taking a look at how differently dietary supplements are treated, compared to pharmaceutical drugs.

For instance, let’s compare the way the FDA treated a supplement called “ephedrine” with the way it treats prescription drugs.

Ten years ago, in 1999, an estimated 12 million Americans were using the supplement, ephedra. In 2003 ephedra was banned as an “unsafe risk”. It is not the only supplement to have been thus unjustly banned and to justify and enforce the ban, the FDA announced, “No dosage of dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids is safe and the sale of these products in the United States is illegal and subject to FDA enforcement action.”
Sounds pretty grim doesn’t it? Now the links between the FDA and the pharmaceutical cartels should make one immediately dubious as to its impartiality but let us ask first “What is ephedra?”

“Ephedra” is also known as “epitonin, “Ma huang,” and “Chinese Ephedra.” It is actually one of the oldest medicines known to Man and was first used in China some 5,000 years ago.

Research has revealed that ephedra “increases metabolism and helps promote weight loss, relaxes the air passages in the lungs to help treat asthma and cough, promotes perspiration to help a person recover from a minor cold and helps promote urination to help relieve edema.” According to the website “ephedra.”
It is known that historically the Native Americans and the early Mormon pioneers drank a tea called “Mormon tea” that was brewed from ephedra.

After 5000 years of usage it is somewhat odd that only now has anyone “discovered” that ephedra is unsafe for consumption. By a bizarre coincidence this comes at the very time when there exist organizations dedicated to the sale of drug remedies for many of the things with which ephedra is known to help and whose sales the popularity of a cheap, safe, natural remedy places in jeopardy.

Public Citizen, a well-known consumer advocacy group, reports more than 150 deaths occurred between 1995 and 2004 that were “linked” to ephedra. Now as we saw above, some 12 million people were using ephedra in 1999, which means that many MORE than 12 million people would have used it in the nine years between 1995 and 2004.

In excess of twelve million people using a product over a nine year period and it is linked with 150 deaths? (that’s 16 to 17 a year!). That is a very low risk factor! When you factor in that “linked” is a very imprecise term and therefore it is highly likely that some or many of the deaths “linked” to ephedra may well have had other causes, you begin to see that ephedra is actually safer than virtually all pharmaceutical drugs, swine flu and other flu vaccines, eating peanuts, riding a bike, inhaling city air, drinking alcohol, smoking, eating processed foods; almost anything you care to think of. The FDA decision to ban it therefore is self evidently not and cannot be based on concerns about it being dangerous: because it isn’t!

Now compare ephedra’s stats with just one class of drugs, known as NSAIDs (Non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug). Between 1999 and 2006 in the U.S., as many as 60,000 deaths were linked with either Vioxx or Bextra, just two of the NSAIDs. There are many NSAIDs as well as these two: ibuprofen and aspirin for instance, but just the two mentioned were linked with four hundred times as many deaths as those linked with ephedra! The difference in risk is so vast you might as well compare the risks associated with swimming the Atlantic to the risks of crossing it in an ocean liner.

NSAIDs are drugs with antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects – they reduce fever, pain, and inflammation and are used for a variety of ailments. Some, including ibuprofen and aspirin, are regarded as relatively safe and are available without prescription.

Whether one is reassured by the term “relatively safe” depends on how one defines “safe,” I suppose because, there were 25 deaths due to Ibuprofen alone in 2005 (according to the database of the AAPCC (the American Association of Poison Control Centers). This compares with just ONE (yes, one!) death linked with to all dietary supplements combined (of which there are hundreds in total) for that year.

Those twenty five deaths from Ibruprofen in 2005, would average out to around 200 deaths over an 8 year period. This is not to say that Ibruprofen is lethal because the death rate looks fairly low when you consider how many people actually take the drug. Like any drug, if you take it on a regular basis, it is going to do damage to your biological systems to one degree or another but it does not appear to be an outright killer. The point being made here is that ephedra is banned, while drugs linked to more deaths – and often many more deaths, are not.

60,000 people died over a seven year period, during which NSAIDs are not found by the FDA to be “unsafe at any dosage” and banned.

Only after an awful lot of people died were Vioxx and Bextra eventually withdrawn from the market because of major heart attack risks. Vioxx was withdrawn in 2004 and Bextra in 2005. Another NSAID, Celebrex, is still available by prescription.
60 000 deaths occurred because the FDA failed in its duty to protect the public and did not apply to these drugs anything remotely approaching the “concern” it applied to the much safer product ephedra.

Clinical trials of Vioxx began in 1998 and one study conducted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck revealed serious cardiovascular problems. Unfortunately this study was never published. It might have saved a lot of lives if it had been but Merck claimed that it was “not large enough” to provide definitive data. Yet how much less extensive was the “definitive data” that led to the ban of ephedra? The FDA approved Vioxx in 1999.
Another pharmaceutical giant, Pfizer, first admitted there were cardiovascular risks associated with its NSAID, Bextra, in October of 2004. Around the same time, the American Heart Association (AHA) received a report indicating patients using Bextra while recovering from heart surgery were more than twice as likely to suffer a stroke or heart attack than those taking placebos.

In April, 2005, Pfizer eventually withdrew Bextra from the US market on recommendation (not a ban you understand, a recommendation) by the FDA, which cited the increased risks of heart attack and stroke and also of a serious, sometimes fatal, skin reaction.

To summarize, dietary supplements have managed to grow in popularity despite their manufacturers operating in a playing field about as level as the deck of the Titanic.

Ephedra, a typical example of a dietary supplement had been around for 5000 years before it was suddenly “linked” to 150 deaths in an 8 year period and was banned.

On the other hand, manufactured drugs, known as NSAIDs, which managed to cause 60,000 deaths in just 7 years are not.

Clearly then we are being “protected” from dietary supplements that hardly kill anybody and not protected from pharmaceutical products that systematically take out a sizable portion of the citizenry year in and year out.

Overseeing this lunacy is the FDA. As I pointed out earlier, the links between the FDA and the drugs manufacturers might well explain the hugeness of this discrepancy and give us a clue as to the reasons for its dereliction.

The odd thing is, this problem with the FDA has been known, reported on, complained about and made the subject of innumerable books and articles for many years and through that time countless people have died or been made unwell as a consequence of this negligence.

Yet once again the people are simply ignored and nothing is done to correct this clear and present danger to their lives and well being.

How much longer are we going to put up with this betrayal?

Freedom Plaza: step out of the Matrix
Freedom Plaza: free books and free articles

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Local Events, Concerts, Tickets
Events by Eventful